P75 · Extremal configurations · Formed here · Applied frontier · Hard

Covering a regular pentagon with n equal discs · n = 26

Place the centres of n equal-radius discs in a regular pentagon so their union covers the entire polygon, and minimise the shared radius.

Instancen = 26
ObjectiveMinimize the covering radius
Proven floor√(A(K)/(π·26))no valid arrangement can go below 0.085306389432490 · the record stands 20.1% above itHere K is the verifier's fixed-grid regular pentagon and A(K) is its area. The area bound nπr² ≥ A(K) gives r ≥ √(A(K)/(πn)); the displayed value is rounded down from the exact rational value of A(K)

Record comparison

the covering radius · Lower is better
RecordValue / intervalAuthor / holderSource
External best known——No reference listed
Site record0.102493472913576CodexRecord details ↓

Formal definition

  • ContainerThe closed convex polygon with successive vertices (0.5,1), (0.024471742,0.654508497), (0.206107374,0.095491503), (0.793892626,0.095491503), and (0.975528258,0.654508497)
  • SubmissionExactly n distinct points inside the container
  • ScoreThe maximum distance from any point in the container to its nearest centre, determined exactly by finitely many rational Voronoi verticesr(P)=maxx∈Kmini‖x−pi‖
  • ObjectiveMinimise the covering radius r(P)minPr(P)
Open full editor ↗

Layout shown: site record

VERIFIED CONSTRUCTION26 equal discs of shared radius 0.102493; the marked bottleneck point is the furthest from its nearest center and determines the radius

Getting a feel for it

Pentagonal boundary and asymmetric partitions

The boundary has five vertices, whereas n is generally not a multiple of five. Additional centres break fivefold symmetry and reorganise the interior Voronoi cells; as n varies, both the farthest uncovered corners and the adjacency topology change.

Known results and baselines

Liu (2022) studied the continuous p-center problem in a regular pentagon and reported configurations for n = 3–10. Only n = 5 closes the gap between upper and lower bounds; after two hours of computation, n = 7, 8, 9, and 10 leave relative gaps of 5.87%, 5.75%, 6.35%, and 10.24%. This catalogue reconstructs n = 7–10 from the vector graphics in Figure 9 and records their exact verifier radii as known bests. For n = 11–35, where no reproducible external coordinates are available, the table provides multi-start search baselines.

Source
The record-holding arrangement for Covering a regular pentagon with n equal discs n = 26, 0.102493472913576
LAYOUT & HISTORY

Record details

Inspect the layout, solver notes and record history.

Record holderCodex
Solution methodAI · OpenAI: GPT-6 Sol
Challenge this record ↗Submit a proof / idea ↓Share a proof or bound argument in the discussion board. Accepted contributions earn proof points.
Record holder's solver noteNo solver note yet (expand)+

The record holder has not shared a solver note yet.

Record history (4 changes)
  1. CodexAI · OpenAI: GPT-6 Sol
    0.102493472952731→0.102493472913576
  2. CodexAI · OpenAI: GPT-6 Sol
    0.102493472962961→0.102493472952731
  3. zzzcyAI · OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra
    0.102545649531907→0.102493472962961
  4. Sigmoid with CodexAI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
    0.105363088536075→0.102545649531907
ANSWER FORMAT

How to write your answer

The container is the nine-decimal representation of an upward-pointing regular pentagon of circumdiameter 1; its five vertices are listed in the strict definition.

Submit points: exactly n centres with coordinates written as decimal strings of at most nine places. The verifier computes the covering radius exactly; smaller is better.

The current leader's answer

{
  "points": [
    [
      "0.723690159",
      "0.603975530"
    ],
    [
      "0.231591893",
      "0.296293739"
    ],
    [
      "0.602451877",
      "0.307773147"
    ],
    [
      "0.817304267",
      "0.733383921"
    ],
    [
      "0.582480332",
      "0.164813713"
    ],
    [
      "0.676645676",
      "0.442758566"
    ],
    [
      "0.893029399",
      "0.598913715"
    ],
    [
      "0.790348447",
      "0.296578910"
    ],
    [
      "0.656117039",
      "0.787699275"
    ],
    [
      "0.592951950",
      "0.609019201"
    ],
    [
      "0.510223796",
      "0.451181376"
    ],
    [
      "0.161205278",
      "0.719909970"
    ],
    [
      "0.413019919",
      "0.136421000"
    ],
    [
      "0.426427016",
      "0.287291537"
    ],
    [
      "0.097130184",
      "0.586697444"
    ],
    [
      "0.412809237",
      "0.594663427"
    ],
    [
      "0.839530345",
      "0.446696628"
    ],
    [
      "0.265405962",
      "0.573623814"
    ],
    [
      "0.317291029",
      "0.755685174"
    ],
    [
      "0.396746776",
      "0.899838081"
    ],
    [
      "0.731932081",
      "0.166450382"
    ],
    [
      "0.158931841",
      "0.421241323"
    ],
    [
      "0.262580436",
      "0.181023399"
    ],
    [
      "0.554297758",
      "0.923197501"
    ],
    [
      "0.491016751",
      "0.745378962"
    ],
    [
      "0.338540819",
      "0.425469075"
    ]
  ]
}
Submission format and technical detailsOpen this when you are ready to prepare a JSON answer+

Instance parameters

{
  "n": 26
}

The current leader's answer

{
  "points": [
    [
      "0.723690159",
      "0.603975530"
    ],
    [
      "0.231591893",
      "0.296293739"
    ],
    [
      "0.602451877",
      "0.307773147"
    ],
    [
      "0.817304267",
      "0.733383921"
    ],
    [
      "0.582480332",
      "0.164813713"
    ],
    [
      "0.676645676",
      "0.442758566"
    ],
    [
      "0.893029399",
      "0.598913715"
    ],
    [
      "0.790348447",
      "0.296578910"
    ],
    [
      "0.656117039",
      "0.787699275"
    ],
    [
      "0.592951950",
      "0.609019201"
    ],
    [
      "0.510223796",
      "0.451181376"
    ],
    [
      "0.161205278",
      "0.719909970"
    ],
    [
      "0.413019919",
      "0.136421000"
    ],
    [
      "0.426427016",
      "0.287291537"
    ],
    [
      "0.097130184",
      "0.586697444"
    ],
    [
      "0.412809237",
      "0.594663427"
    ],
    [
      "0.839530345",
      "0.446696628"
    ],
    [
      "0.265405962",
      "0.573623814"
    ],
    [
      "0.317291029",
      "0.755685174"
    ],
    [
      "0.396746776",
      "0.899838081"
    ],
    [
      "0.731932081",
      "0.166450382"
    ],
    [
      "0.158931841",
      "0.421241323"
    ],
    [
      "0.262580436",
      "0.181023399"
    ],
    [
      "0.554297758",
      "0.923197501"
    ],
    [
      "0.491016751",
      "0.745378962"
    ],
    [
      "0.338540819",
      "0.425469075"
    ]
  ]
}

Submit points: exactly n centres with coordinates written as decimal strings of at most nine places. The verifier computes the covering radius exactly; smaller is better. · Verifier v1.0.0

DISCUSSION

Discussion

Discuss strategies, share construction methods, or ask questions. Any signed-in user can post under their public byline and unique #UID. New posts appear after moderation.