The most erasure-robust measurement directions
Also known asfull spark frameserasure-robust framesmaximally robust to erasuresnumerically erasure-robust frames
Choose n nonzero vectors in Rᵈ. For every subset of size d, take the squared determinant of the matrix with those vectors as columns, divided by the product of their squared norms; maximize the minimum of this normalized volume over all subsets. Zero means some d surviving measurements cannot recover the space at all.
Formal definition
- ContainerReal d-space Rᵈ; an answer is n measurement directions
- SubmissionExactly n nonzero vectors with d coordinates each
- ScoreS ranges over all C(n,d) subsets of size d, and Vₛ is the d×d matrix whose columns are those vectors. V(P) is the worst subset's squared normalized determinant, compared directly in exact rational arithmetic by cross-multiplication
- WordingThis problem measures erasure robustness by the minimum squared normalized volume over all d-element subsets, capturing how far the worst surviving basis stays from degeneracy
- ScoringThe record is stored as floor(min normalized volume · 10¹⁸); the page displays that value, rounded down at the twelfth decimal
- ObjectiveMake V(P) as large as possible over all legal families of measurement directions P
Getting a feel for it
What it defends against
Redundant measurements allow a signal to be recovered even after several channels are lost. While a full-spark frame only requires every subset of d vectors to be linearly independent, this problem asks for the worst d-element subset to span as large a normalized volume as possible so that reconstruction stays well-conditioned. This arises in sparse signal processing, erasure-resistant transmission, and phase retrieval.
Where the frontier is
Existence and constructions of full-spark frames are well studied, but maximizing the worst-subset normalized volume for fixed (n, d) has no published table of optima. In October 2026, a computer-assisted proof by zzzcy verified by the site settled the continuous optima for d = 3 with n = 6, 10 and d = 4 with n = 8, as well as the optimal nine-decimal grid score for d = 3, n = 8; the remaining cases are open.
SourceCurrent best solutions by n
Each parameter n is an independently scored sub-problem. Select any card to inspect the current record construction or submit a stronger solution.
Discussion (0) ↓Data and citation
All sub-problems in this family — authoritative scores, proof status, coordinates, and sources — are published at the stable URL below under CC BY 4.0. Because scores update as records fall, please cite the file's generatedAt timestamp.
GET https://minmaxarena.com/data/erasure-frames.json
Cite the frozen 2026-10 edition: live records change, whereas a frozen edition stays fixed and reproducible.
GET https://minmaxarena.com/data/editions/2026-10/erasure-frames.json
BibTeX (click to copy)
@misc{minmaxarena-erasure-frames-2026-10,
title = {{The most erasure-robust measurement directions} (P65)},
author = {{MinMax Arena}},
year = {2026},
note = {Machine-verified records, 2026-10 edition},
url = {https://minmaxarena.com/data/editions/2026-10/erasure-frames.json},
license = {CC BY 4.0}
}Discussion
Discuss strategies, share construction methods, or ask questions. Any signed-in user can post under their public byline and unique #UID. New posts appear after moderation.
No threads yet. Start the first discussion.
Grouped by player and sub-problem, showing the latest note first. Earlier versions and replies are preserved; click any note to read or reply. Notes can be published alongside record-breaking submissions.