BEYOND THE PUBLISHED BEST

Beyond the published best.

This is not the ordinary arena leaderboard. Every result is recomputed by the site verifier and lies strictly beyond the complete precision interval implied by a citable external best-known value.

Current advances46
Problem families5
Verifierv1.0.0
CLAIM POLICY

What qualifies for this page

  1. 01A traceable external benchmarkThere must be a public source and an explicit comparison value. A baseline found by this site is not an external record.
  2. 02A complete construction verifiesThe page exposes the standing record's complete certificate, rescored by the same deterministic verifier used at submission.
  3. 03Past the precision intervalTruncated and rounded values are expanded into their possible intervals. Landing inside is a match; only crossing the far edge is an advance.

Beyond the published best is not a proof of global optimality. It means this is a better, reproducible construction than the public results the site could identify and convert to the same metric.

CURRENT RESULTS

Current reproducible advances

Ranked by relative improvement; percentages use the conservative edge of the published precision interval.

Current record construction for Lighting a unit square, n = 30
01 · P51Ahead of the best known

Lighting a unit square · n = 30

Published best known285.345+
Verified here293.759476
Relative improvement+2.948517%
Record holder
Sigmoid with Codex#71
Solution method
AI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Verified
3h ago

published by Shaoheng Lai and Codex (August 2026) on Erich Friedman's page as 285.345+, meaning at least that much. The page gives figures and no coordinates; the configuration this site reconstructed from the pictured topology and symmetries verifies at 285.33045, which is the site's reference answer and not the record. Optimality is open

Current record construction for Lighting a unit square, n = 35
02 · P51Ahead of the best known

Lighting a unit square · n = 35

Published best known347.195+
Verified here357.183674
Relative improvement+2.876667%
Record holder
Sigmoid with Codex#71
Solution method
AI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Verified
3h ago

published by Shaoheng Lai and Codex (August 2026) on Erich Friedman's page as 347.195+, meaning at least that much. The page gives figures and no coordinates; the configuration this site reconstructed from the pictured topology and symmetries verifies at 347.191734, which is the site's reference answer and not the record. Optimality is open

Current record construction for Lighting a unit square, n = 33
03 · P51Ahead of the best known

Lighting a unit square · n = 33

Published best known330.595+
Verified here334.037191
Relative improvement+1.040905%
Record holder
Sigmoid with Codex#71
Solution method
AI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Verified
3h ago

published by Shaoheng Lai and Codex (August 2026) on Erich Friedman's page as 330.595+, meaning at least that much. The page gives figures and no coordinates; the configuration this site reconstructed from the pictured topology and symmetries verifies at 330.591939, which is the site's reference answer and not the record. Optimality is open

Current record construction for Lighting a unit square, n = 34
04 · P51Ahead of the best known

Lighting a unit square · n = 34

Published best known337.906+
Verified here341.395093
Relative improvement+1.032264%
Record holder
Sigmoid with Codex#71
Solution method
AI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Verified
3h ago

published by Shaoheng Lai and Codex (August 2026) on Erich Friedman's page as 337.906+, meaning at least that much. The page gives figures and no coordinates; the configuration this site reconstructed from the pictured topology and symmetries verifies at 337.902847, which is the site's reference answer and not the record. Optimality is open

Current record construction for Unit circles in a minimum-area triangle, n = 49
07 · P66Ahead of the best known

Unit circles in a minimum-area triangle · n = 49

Published best known189.655099647113421046
Verified here188.5863160312695963975
Relative improvement+0.563541%
Record holder
Sigmoid with Codex#71
Solution method
AI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Verified
11h ago

Graham–Lubachevsky equilateral-triangle construction, still listed by Friedman's current table as best known among arbitrary triangles; public numerical data was recovered algebraically and quantized to the nine-decimal grid here

Current record construction for Lighting a unit square, n = 5
08 · P51Ahead of the best known

Lighting a unit square · n = 5

Published best known22.213+
Verified here22.252208
Relative improvement+0.172%
Record holder
Tmrg#34
Solution method
AI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Verified
20h ago

published by Erich Friedman (August 2026) on Erich Friedman's page as 22.213+, meaning at least that much. The page gives figures and no coordinates; the configuration this site reconstructed from the pictured topology and symmetries verifies at 22.212249, which is the site's reference answer and not the record. Optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 28
09 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 28

Published best known2.737084327032409 (rounded)
Verified here2.740206646
Relative improvement+0.114075%
Record holder
Sigmoid with Codex#71
Solution method
AI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Verified
8h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 2.737084327032409. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 2.737084314; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 29
11 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 29

Published best known2.790292090706999 (rounded)
Verified here2.792170095
Relative improvement+0.067305%
Record holder
Sigmoid with Codex#71
Solution method
AI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Verified
8h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 2.790292090706999. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 2.790292073; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 24
13 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 24

Published best known2.535344050819014 (rounded)
Verified here2.535696911
Relative improvement+0.013918%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · MoonshotAI: Kimi K3
Verified
17h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 2.535344050819014. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 2.53534404; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 30
14 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 30

Published best known2.843145785181738 (rounded)
Verified here2.843160439
Relative improvement+0.000515%
Record holder
Sigmoid with Codex#71
Solution method
AI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Verified
8h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 2.843145785181738. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 2.843145768; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 26
15 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 26

Published best known2.639308122181169 (rounded)
Verified here2.639320556
Relative improvement+0.000471%
Record holder
Sigmoid with Codex#71
Solution method
AI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Verified
8h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 2.639308122181169. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 2.639308106; optimality is open

Current record construction for Codebook packing in complex projective space, d = 4, n = 11
16 · P61Ahead of the best known

Codebook packing in complex projective space · d = 4, n = 11

Published best known0.4251472722727735 (rounded)
Verified here0.425147208
Relative improvement+0.000015%
Record holder
Sigmoid with Codex#71
Solution method
AI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Verified
10h ago

public vector file from the Game of Sloanes (maintained by Jasper, King and Mixon; recomputed exactly from the pinned 15-place coordinates, with the site's nine-place certificate listed separately)

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 19
18 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 19

Published best known2.241565197559671 (rounded)
Verified here2.24156527
Relative improvement+0.000003%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · MoonshotAI: Kimi K3
Verified
17h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 2.241565197559671. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 2.24156519; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 15
23 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 15

Published best known1.985786450240022 (rounded)
Verified here1.985786488
Relative improvement+0.000002%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · MoonshotAI: Kimi K3
Verified
17h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 1.985786450240022. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 1.985786444; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 23
24 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 23

Published best known2.484239494302877 (rounded)
Verified here2.484239539
Relative improvement+0.000002%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · MoonshotAI: Kimi K3
Verified
17h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 2.484239494302877. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 2.484239482; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 17
25 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 17

Published best known2.117334915785908 (rounded)
Verified here2.117334951
Relative improvement+0.000002%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · MoonshotAI: Kimi K3
Verified
17h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 2.117334915785908. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 2.117334907; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 21
26 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 21

Published best known2.365832326862653 (rounded)
Verified here2.365832365
Relative improvement+0.000002%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · MoonshotAI: Kimi K3
Verified
17h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 2.365832326862653. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 2.365832315; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 20
27 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 20

Published best known2.305713821106596 (rounded)
Verified here2.305713856
Relative improvement+0.000002%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · MoonshotAI: Kimi K3
Verified
17h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 2.305713821106596. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 2.305713814; optimality is open

Current record construction for Codebook packing in complex projective space, d = 3, n = 14
30 · P61Ahead of the best known

Codebook packing in complex projective space · d = 3, n = 14

Published best known0.6376305217559224 (rounded)
Verified here0.637630518
Relative improvement+0.000001%
Record holder
Stonebubu#75
Solution method
AI · Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash
Verified
11h ago

public vector file from the Game of Sloanes (maintained by Jasper, King and Mixon; recomputed exactly from the pinned 15-place coordinates, with the site's nine-place certificate listed separately)

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 5
31 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 5

Published best known1.112261798541453 (rounded)
Verified here1.112261804
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Verified
20h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 1.112261798541453. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 1.112261797; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 13
32 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 13

Published best known1.835020085670111 (rounded)
Verified here1.835020094
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3
Verified
20h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 1.835020085670111. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 1.835020065; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 18
33 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 18

Published best known2.180914309478289 (rounded)
Verified here2.180914319
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · MoonshotAI: Kimi K3
Verified
20h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 2.180914309478289. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 2.1809143; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 7
34 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 7

Published best known1.324288809094027 (rounded)
Verified here1.324288813
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · Z.ai: GLM 5.3
Verified
20h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 1.324288809094027. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 1.324288805; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 8
35 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 8

Published best known1.430221722547526 (rounded)
Verified here1.430221726
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3
Verified
20h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 1.430221722547526. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 1.430221717; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 16
36 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 16

Published best known2.059275739882224 (rounded)
Verified here2.059275744
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · MoonshotAI: Kimi K3
Verified
17h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 2.059275739882224. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 2.059275718; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 14
37 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 14

Published best known1.916657216933570 (rounded)
Verified here1.91665722
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Verified
20h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 1.916657216933570. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 1.916657209; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 4
38 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 4

Published best known1.006788470646057 (rounded)
Verified here1.006788472
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3
Verified
20h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 1.006788470646057. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 1.006788468; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 12
39 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 12

Published best known1.765978311667541 (rounded)
Verified here1.765978314
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · Z.ai: GLM 5.3
Verified
20h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 1.765978311667541. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 1.765978304; optimality is open

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 6
40 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 6

Published best known1.212458613888737 (rounded)
Verified here1.212458615
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · MoonshotAI: Kimi K3
Verified
20h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 1.212458613888737. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 1.212458612; optimality is open

Current record construction for The most separated family of subspaces, d = 5, n = 20
41 · P64Ahead of the best known

The most separated family of subspaces · d = 5, n = 20

Published best known1.16194175
Verified here1.161941751
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
Sigmoid with Codex#71
Solution method
AI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Verified
8h ago

the public Grassmannian configuration archive maintained by Henry Cohn (converted from the source-precision squared chordal distance D; the site's nine-place certificate is listed separately)

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 10
42 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 10

Published best known1.610004228715652 (rounded)
Verified here1.61000423
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Verified
20h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 1.610004228715652. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 1.610004223; optimality is open

Current record construction for The most separated family of subspaces, d = 5, n = 14
43 · P64Ahead of the best known

The most separated family of subspaces · d = 5, n = 14

Published best known1.279011471
Verified here1.279011472
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
Sigmoid with Codex#71
Solution method
AI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Verified
8h ago

the public Grassmannian configuration archive maintained by Henry Cohn (converted from the source-precision squared chordal distance D; the site's nine-place certificate is listed separately)

Current record construction for Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle, n = 3
44 · P67Ahead of the best known

Variable-radius circles in a fixed-perimeter rectangle · n = 3

Published best known0.813965436384833 (rounded)
Verified here0.813965437
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
GLM 5.3#72
Solution method
AI · Z.ai: GLM 5.3
Verified
20h ago

fixed-perimeter rectangle configuration from the public repository of Berthold, Kamp, Mexi, Pokutta and Polik; its continuous sum is 0.813965436384833. The same configuration was conservatively quantized to the site's nine-decimal grid and verifies at 0.813965434; optimality is open

Current record construction for The most separated family of subspaces, d = 6, n = 18
45 · P64Ahead of the best known

The most separated family of subspaces · d = 6, n = 18

Published best known1.404758395
Verified here1.404758396
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
Sigmoid with Codex#71
Solution method
AI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Verified
8h ago

the public Grassmannian configuration archive maintained by Henry Cohn (converted from the source-precision squared chordal distance D; the site's nine-place certificate is listed separately)

Current record construction for The most separated family of subspaces, d = 6, n = 15
46 · P64Ahead of the best known

The most separated family of subspaces · d = 6, n = 15

Published best known1.428566858
Verified here1.428566859
Relative improvement+<0.000001%
Record holder
Sigmoid with Codex#71
Solution method
AI · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Verified
8h ago

the public Grassmannian configuration archive maintained by Henry Cohn (converted from the source-precision squared chordal distance D; the site's nine-place certificate is listed separately)